CCommons

The teacher who made me stop being scared of physics (with a key on a thread)

A small story about a Tuesday, a pendulum, and the sentence I still carry around.

Riya Singh12th Sample

10 Oct 2026 Β· 5 min read

Photo: MOs810 Β· CC BY-SA 4.0 Β· via Wikimedia Commons

I was never a physics person. I want to say that first, in case someone reading this is in that place right now. In class 9 I thought physics was a language invented to make me feel stupid. I read poems for fun. I was fine with metaphor, with ambiguity, with "what does the poet really mean". Physics wanted answers, and I felt that every answer was a door that was locked.

Then in class 11 we got a new physics teacher. I won't use her name. I'll just call her ma'am. She was around fifty, wore plain cotton sarees, and carried a bunch of keys on a string around her wrist. We found out later that wasn't a style choice. It was a teaching aid.

The Tuesday

It was the second week of the term. The topic was oscillations, and half the class had already zoned out because the first slide had a formula with a square root in it. I sat in the third row, doodling a small moon in the margin of my notebook.

Ma'am stopped talking. She took one of her keys off the string, held the thread up and let the key swing. She didn't say anything. She just stood there, letting it move back and forth in front of the whole class.

After maybe fifteen seconds of silence, she said:

"Tell me what you see. Don't tell me the physics. Tell me what you see."

People started saying things.

"It's going left and right." "It slows down at the ends." "It's fastest in the middle." "It keeps going for a long time."

She wrote each sentence on the board exactly as we said it. Then she said, "That's physics. You just did it. The formula is only a way to be very precise about what you already noticed."

I actually remember that I stopped doodling.

What happened next

She made us do something odd. She gave each bench a thread and a small weight (a key, a nut, someone's ring) and told us to measure how long it takes to swing back and forth ten times, with a phone stopwatch. Then change the length of the thread and do it again. Then change the weight and do it again.

And what we found, very quietly, with no formula yet, was this:

  • When you made the thread longer, the swings got slower.
  • When you changed the weight, almost nothing changed. (A heavier key did not swing slower. We argued about this for a while. I did not believe it. The boy next to me re-did it three times.)

Then she wrote one line on the board:

T=2Ο€LgT = 2\pi \sqrt{\frac{L}{g}}

and said, "This is what you just found, with a little tidying. The time for one swing depends on the length LL and on gg. It does not depend on the mass. This works for small swings."

I still remember the small shock that the weight didn't matter. It felt like a poem that said less than I expected and meant more.

The sentence I carry

She said something at the end of that class that I wrote down in the last page of my diary, where I keep things I want to remember:

"Physics is not about knowing the answer. It is about being a careful noticer."

I've probably used that sentence more than any formula she taught me.

What changed in me

It's strange. My marks didn't jump overnight. I still fumbled numericals. I still messed up units. But the fear went. Something shifted from "I'm too poetic for this" to "this is also noticing, and I'm good at noticing."

I started asking why things moved the way they did on the bus. Why the water in my bottle tilts when the bus brakes. Why the swing at the park, if you stand up on it instead of sitting, goes faster (you change the effective length, so the period changes, which also tells you something about the formula!). I started writing small poems about it, bad ones. One was about a pendulum forgetting how to stop. It rhymed, barely.

The thing I'd tell other students

If a subject scares you, the problem might not be you or the subject. It might be that nobody has shown you how to look at it yet. Some teachers give you answers. Some teachers give you a way of looking. The second kind is rare and you'll know when you meet one.

And if you are the kind of person who thinks in metaphors: physics is full of them. A field is a metaphor that turned out to be true. A wave is a metaphor that turned out to be true.

A short, honest note

I never told ma'am any of this. I said "thank you" once, at the end of the year, in a rush, while collecting my report card. She smiled and said, "Beta, you asked good questions." That was it.

I'm writing this partly as a thank-you note that I couldn't write then. I don't know if she'll ever read it, and I'm okay with that.

If you've had a teacher who changed how you see a subject, write about it below. Even in two lines. I'd like to read those.

WhatsAppPost on X

11 responses

Sign in to join the conversation.

  • [+]Zoya Khan12thSampleΒ· 9d ago

    This made my eyes a little wet, riya. "A careful noticer" is such a lovely way to put it, and I think it applies to more than physics: to people, to feelings, to our own mind on a bad day. I had a Hindi teacher who did the same for me with poems; she never told us what a poem meant, she asked us what we felt when the line ended. I think the best teachers hand you a way of looking and then step back.

    • [+]Riya Singh12thSampleΒ· 9d agoAuthor

      thank you zoya. Yes, the "step back" part is what I'm still learning from her.

  • [+]Arjun Nair12thSampleΒ· 9d ago

    Small detail for people who want to try this: the period is independent of mass only because the weight cancels out. Force on the bob along the arc is mgsin⁑θmg\sin\theta and acceleration is that divided by mm, so mm drops out. And the formula is valid only for small angles (a rule of thumb is under about 10 degrees), where sinβ‘ΞΈβ‰ˆΞΈ\sin\theta \approx \theta. For big swings, the period gets longer than the formula says.

    Also the standing-on-the-swing thing is cool. You're right that you lower/raise the centre of mass and so change the effective length.

    • [+]Riya Singh12thSampleΒ· 9d agoAuthor

      okay that's the explanation I was missing for years. thank you arjun. I'll try the key at 10 and 45 degrees and see if I can see the difference.

  • [+]Rohan Sharma11thSampleΒ· 9d ago

    lowkey the "tell me what you see, not the physics" thing is genius. my physics teacher goes straight to the formula and half the class dies in the first 2 mins

  • [+]Meera Patel11thSampleΒ· 9d ago

    I tried the thread experiment after reading this because my teacher mentioned it in class but I never did it. Ten swings with a hair clip, length 50 cm, took 14.2 s. So T=1.42T = 1.42 s. Formula gives 2Ο€0.5/9.8β‰ˆ1.422\pi\sqrt{0.5/9.8} \approx 1.42 s. I actually said "wait what" out loud in my room.

    • [+]Riya Singh12thSampleΒ· 9d agoAuthor

      MEERA. that's so good. this is exactly the moment.

  • [+]Sara Fernandes11thSampleΒ· 8d ago

    My PE teacher was that for me, but with football. She never taught drills first. She made us just watch the ball for five minutes and describe it. Same energy as the key.

  • [+]Diya Menon11thSampleΒ· 8d ago

    omg my bio teacher once made us look at a single leaf for 20 minutes and write what we see, not what the book says. best class ever. loved this post riya 🌿

  • [+]Neel Chatterjee12thSampleΒ· 8d ago

    Quietly: a pendulum is also a good way to measure gg locally. Rearranging, g=4Ο€2L/T2g = 4\pi^2 L / T^2. With your clip numbers you could get a decent estimate, within a few percent.

  • [+]Kavya NaikDropperSampleΒ· 7d ago

    Riya, please write her a letter even if you don't post it. Teachers rarely hear this. My amma is a teacher, and the notes from old students are the ones she keeps in a box.

More from Riya Singh