CCommons

ΔG is zero at equilibrium but ΔG° = -RT ln K is not, why? Also, where's the third law?

Rahul DubeyDropper Sample

20 Sept 2026 · 1 min read

Third attempt, and I still catch myself writing the wrong symbol in thermodynamics. Time to fix it at root.

NCERT says that at equilibrium ΔG=0\Delta G = 0. It also gives ΔG∘=−RTln⁡K\Delta G^\circ = -RT\ln K. If ΔG\Delta G is zero at equilibrium, why is ΔG∘\Delta G^\circ not zero? In my notes I even have both statements on the same page, and they look contradictory.

What I do remember is the Gibbs equation ΔG=ΔH−TΔS\Delta G = \Delta H - T\Delta S and the rule of thumb: negative means spontaneous. For a reaction with ΔH=+30\Delta H = +30 kJ/mol and ΔS=+100\Delta S = +100 J/(K mol) I want to find the temperature above which it becomes spontaneous, and I forget units mismatch (kJ vs J) every single time.

Third: the third law. I know the statement "entropy of a perfect crystal at 0 K is zero" but I don't see why this matters for numericals. We never use it directly, do we?

If I can get these three straight, half of my thermodynamics mistakes from last year disappear.

WhatsAppPost on X

7 answers & replies

Sign in to join the conversation.

  • [+]Ishita GoyalDropperSample· 29d ago

    ΔG\Delta G is for the actual mixture at a given moment, ΔG∘\Delta G^\circ is for the standard state (everything at standard conditions, 1 bar). They are connected by

    ΔG=ΔG∘+RTln⁡Q\Delta G = \Delta G^\circ + RT\ln Q

    At equilibrium Q=KQ = K and ΔG=0\Delta G = 0, so 0=ΔG∘+RTln⁡K0 = \Delta G^\circ + RT\ln K, which gives ΔG∘=−RTln⁡K\Delta G^\circ = -RT\ln K. Not a contradiction, just two different quantities. ΔG\Delta G tells you which way the reaction goes from where you are. ΔG∘\Delta G^\circ tells you where equilibrium lies.

    • [+]Rahul DubeyDropperSample· 29d agoAuthor

      Clear. ΔG tells direction, ΔG° tells where equilibrium sits. Writing this as a headline in my notebook.

  • [+]Tushar PawarDropperSample· 29d ago

    I think ΔG° is also zero at equilibrium, which makes K = 1, so at equilibrium reactants and products are in equal amounts. It's the same condition really.

  • [+]Siddharth RaoDropperSample· 29d ago

    Tushar, ΔG° = 0 only when K = 1. That's one special case. For most reactions K is far from 1. Example at 298 K: ΔG∘=−2.303RTlog⁡K\Delta G^\circ = -2.303RT\log K and 2.303RT≈5.72.303RT \approx 5.7 kJ/mol, so for K=105K = 10^5 you get ΔG∘≈−28.5\Delta G^\circ \approx -28.5 kJ/mol, clearly not zero, yet that reaction sits at equilibrium with ΔG = 0 when the mixture reaches Q = K. Large negative ΔG° means K is large. Positive ΔG° means K < 1.

    • [+]Tushar PawarDropperSample· 29d ago

      ah ok, ΔG° = 0 only if K = 1. I mixed ΔG and ΔG° again. thanks!

  • [+]Kavya NaikDropperSample· 29d ago

    Your numerical, in the right units. At the switchover temperature ΔG=0\Delta G = 0:

    T=ΔHΔS=30000 J/mol100 J/(K mol)=300 KT = \frac{\Delta H}{\Delta S} = \frac{30000\ \text{J/mol}}{100\ \text{J/(K mol)}} = 300\ \text{K}

    So above 300 K, −TΔS-T\Delta S wins and the reaction is spontaneous. Always convert kJ to J before dividing, that was my mistake too, amma kept scolding me.

    Summary of signs: ΔH−\Delta H -, ΔS+\Delta S + always spontaneous. ΔH+\Delta H +, ΔS−\Delta S - never. Same signs, depends on temperature (both ++: high T favours, both −-: low T favours).

  • [+]Lakshmi TripathiDropperSample· 29d ago

    Third law matters because it lets us have absolute entropies. At 0 K a perfect crystal has only one possible arrangement (one microstate), so S=0S = 0. From there you measure heat capacities up in temperature and get an absolute value of SS at 298 K. That's why tables list standard molar entropies S∘S^\circ as actual positive numbers. Enthalpy has no such zero point, so tables give ΔH\Delta H of formation only, never absolute HH. That's the reason you can calculate ΔSreaction∘\Delta S^\circ_{reaction} = sum of S∘S^\circ products − sum of S∘S^\circ reactants.

More from Rahul Dubey