van't Hoff factor for association and dissociation: deriving i with α, and why NaCl never shows exactly 2
Second attempt, and I want this chapter to be a strength.
Siddharth RaoDropper Sample
12 Oct 2026 · 1 min read
Last year this was where I dropped silly marks, so this time I'm trying to actually understand instead of cramming.
What I know: the observed colligative property is different from the calculated one when solute associates or dissociates. We define
and the corrected formulas are , , and so on.
What I'm shaky on:
- The relation between and degree of dissociation for a compound that gives ions: I remember but can't derive it, and for association (like acetic acid dimerising in benzene) I mix the signs.
- How many particles for K₄[Fe(CN)₆]? I often count wrong in objective questions.
- NCERT's table shows for NaCl at 0.1 m is a bit less than 2 even though NaCl is a strong electrolyte. Why? Complete dissociation should give exactly 2.
Any clean derivations and a small worked example would be great.
6 answers & replies
Sign in to join the conversation.
[+][–]Nisha Verma12thSample· 8d ago
Derivation for dissociation. Start with 1 mol of solute, fraction dissociates into particles each:
- left undissociated:
- ions formed:
- total after dissociation:
Since the colligative property depends on the number of particles, .
Example: BaCl₂ with : , .
[+][–]Mehak AroraDropperSample· 8d ago
For counting particles, K₄[Fe(CN)₆] gives 4 K⁺ ions, so i = 4. The complex ion is one unit so it doesn't count separately, it just stays together like one block... I think the 4 is from potassium only. That's how I did it in the last two tests and I got those right by luck maybe?
[+][–]Ishita GoyalDropperSample· 8d ago
Mehak, the complex anion [Fe(CN)₆]⁴⁻ is also a particle in solution, just a single (big) one. So the dissociation is
That's 4 + 1 = 5 particles, so for complete dissociation. The complex stays intact (it doesn't break into Fe and CN), but it still counts as one particle. Similarly [Cu(NH₃)₄]SO₄ gives 2 and K₃[Fe(CN)₆] gives 4.
[+][–]Pooja Iyer12thSample· 7d ago
Association mirrors it. Say molecules join to make 1 big molecule, with degree of association . Start with 1 mol of monomer:
- remaining monomer:
- associated particles formed:
- total:
For acetic acid dimerising in benzene (), full association gives . If , . So for association, for dissociation.
[+][–]Siddharth RaoDropperSample· 7d agoAuthor
Both derivations are clear now. The 'particles count' idea is the key, I will stop memorising two separate formulas. Thank you, I owe you all chai.
[+][–]Zoya Khan12thSample· 7d ago
On (3): in a solution that is not infinitely dilute, oppositely charged ions pull on each other and some of them stay close for a bit (ion pairing). Each one doesn't behave as a fully independent particle, so the effective number of free particles is slightly less than 2, and is slightly less than 2. As the solution gets more dilute the ions are farther apart, the attraction matters less, and comes closer and closer to 2. NaCl is a strong electrolyte, so it's 'fully dissociated into ions', but it's not 'ideal'.




